Publications

Detailed Information

Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: A rabbit study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, K.H.-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, S.J.-
dc.contributor.authorKoak, J.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, S.K.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, S.H.-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Y.J.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, J.B.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-22T08:15:23Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-22T08:15:23Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, Vol.34, No.7, pp.517-527ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0305-182X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/80988-
dc.description.abstractThe oxide layer that covers a titanium surface is extremely stable and appears to have excellent biocompatibility, which can result in successful osseointegration. The aim of this study was to analyse the characteristics of an oxide layer formed by anodic oxidation (anodization), and to evaluate the extent of bone healing around the anodized implant. The screw-type implants were made of commercially pure titanium (Grade 2). The Group 1 samples had a turned surface, and three other types of experimental specimens were anodized under constant voltages of 190 V (Group 2), 230 V (Group 3) and 270 V (Group 4). The surface characteristics of each sample type were inspected. Removal torque was measured after a 4-week healing period and the histomorphometric analysis was performed 6 weeks after implantation in rabbit tibiae. There was an increase in both the size and number of pores as the anodizing voltage increased. The Ra value of the Group 4 samples was higher than those in the Group 1 and 2 samples (P < 0.05). Group 3 showed a difference compared with Group 1 (P < 0.05). A thicker oxide layer, which contained crystalline (anatase) TiO2 with the inclusion of some electrolytes (Ca, P), was formed at the higher anodizing voltage. Group 4 had higher removal torque values and percentages of bone-to-implant contact than the other groups (P < 0.05). The anodized titanium implants showed more intimate and stronger connections with peri-implant bone during early osseointegration than the turned titanium implants in this experimental model. (C) 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant from the Korea Health 21 R&D project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (02-PJ3-PG6-EV11-002).ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingko_KR
dc.subjectAnodic oxidation (anodization)ko_KR
dc.subjectTitanium implantko_KR
dc.subjectRemoval torqueko_KR
dc.subjectHistomorphometric analysisko_KR
dc.subjectOxide layerko_KR
dc.titleOsseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: A rabbit studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박규화-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor허성주-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor곽재영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김성균-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김성훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임영준-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이재봉-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01688.x-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of Oral Rehabilitation-
dc.description.tc22-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share