Browse

국어 심리형용사문의 몇 가지 문제
Some Problems on Psych-adjective Sentences of Korean

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김세중-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:33:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:33:55Z-
dc.date.issued1989-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.25 No.1, pp. 151-165ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85831-
dc.description.abstractPsych-adjective sentences have been discussed due to the special character in their syntax and semantics. In Korean, they have two noun phrases. The issue is which of the two NPs is the subject of a sentence and what is the grammatical function of the other NP. We argue that both NPs are all arguments of psych-adjectives, and the first NP (in unmarked word order) is a subject and the second NP is a complement. That is, psych adjectives are special kind of predicate in that they require two arguments, experiencer and object. Thus, the second NP arguments of psych-adjectives, anita(not to be), toeta (become) are grouped as a natural class since they form an AP together with those predicates. However, the reason why the nominative case marker -ka is attached to the complement NP argument needs to be solved. And, the dative marker -eke can be attached to the first NP argument of some psych-adjectives should be explained. The commonness and difference of psych-adjectives are also discussed.ko_KR
dc.language.isokoko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.title국어 심리형용사문의 몇 가지 문제ko_KR
dc.title.alternativeSome Problems on Psych-adjective Sentences of Koreanko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorKim, Sejung-
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 25 Number 1/4 (1989)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse