Browse

Past Habituality in English Discourse; used to and would

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSuh, Kyung-Hee-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:38:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:38:12Z-
dc.date.issued1992-12-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.28 No.4, pp. 857-882ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85945-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an empirically grounded discourse analysis of the English past habitual expressions, used to and would, in oral narrative and conversation. A text - based examination of these two competing forms in various contexts shows that used to has an episode-initiating function by way of framing a past habitual episode and would is subsequently used for elaboration within the frame. The discourse-Organizational functions of used to and would are found to derive from the different semantic properties of each form; first of all, used to marks independently a now-defunct past habitual event, while the past habitual reading of would depends totally on discourse contexts or frames. Secondly, in denoting past habitual situations, used to tends to characterize the occasion as a whole, whereas the subsequent instances of would refer to separate and specific fractions of the occasion.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titlePast Habituality in English Discourse; used to and wouldko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 28 Number 1/4 (1992)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse