Publications
Detailed Information
Anaphoricity and Logophoricity
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Ki-Sook | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-07T07:45:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-07T07:45:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 어학연구, Vol.36 No.1, pp. 83-102 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0254-4474 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/86131 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There are two approaches to an anaphor. One approach is that an anaphor is used either as an anaphor or a logophor according to the context. The other is that an anaphor is separated from a logophor. In this paper, I review and discuss several motivations for the division of the reflexive into an anaphor and a logophor. As evidence, I search for the properties of each. I conclude that an anaphor and a logophor co-exist in the Universal Grammar, showing different properties. That some African languages have a morphologically distinct set of pronouns to express the logophoricity gives a clue to my argument that an anaphor and a logophor exist separately in the Universal Grammar. | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 언어교육원 | ko_KR |
dc.title | Anaphoricity and Logophoricity | ko_KR |
dc.type | SNU Journal | ko_KR |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 어학연구 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.