Browse

Underlying Representation in Optimality Theory

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHong, Sunghoon-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:46:18Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:46:18Z-
dc.date.issued2001-06-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.37 No.2, pp. 377-400ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/86172-
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses how we should deal with underlying representation (UR) in Optimality Theory (OT ), focusing in particular on the proper method of Lexicon Optimization (LO), a mechanism in OT that determines a 'real' input among various possible inputs. After closely examining previous proposals, I conclude that Kager's (1999) model of LO is most promising, only if it is controlled by a meta- principle, Input- Output Isomorphy, that guarantees a UR to be identical to its surface form in the cases where underlying contrasts are expressed at surface level. I demonstrate that LO performed in this way provides a good account of UR for allomorphy cases without posing any problem to Richness of the Base, one of the fundamental concepts in OT.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titleUnderlying Representation in Optimality Theoryko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 37 Number 1/4 (2001)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse