Browse

Generics and Exceptinos: A Reply to Cohen (2004)

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
Yoon, YoungEun
Issue Date
2006
Publisher
서울대학교 언어교육원
Citation
어학연구, Vol.42 No.1, pp. 69-97
Keywords
genericsexceptionshomogeneitymental representationstree representationsgeometric representationscognitive conceptualizations
Abstract
It is well known that exceptions are allowed in generics. Concerning this widely-agreed-upon phenomenon of exceptions in generics, Cohen (2004) argues that exceptions are allowed only if "homogeneity" is not violated. That is, the exceptions should not form a salient "chunk" of the domain of the generic. For this, he proposes two ways of mapping of cognitive mental representations, namely, "tree" and "geometric" representations. It will be argued in this paper, however, that choices between these two mental representations claimed to be involved in the interpretation process of generics are quite arbitrary, and that counterexamples also exist for the "homogeneity" requirement. Given this, the main purpose of this paper will be to discuss the problems of Cohen's theory. Its other purpose will be to try to delve into the fundamental issue of the meaning of generics, and to suggest that generics, similar to metaphors, involve cognitive conceptualizations based on the language users' encyclopedic knowledge, world knowledge from experiences, common sense, beliefs, stereotypes, prejudices, etc.
ISSN
0254-4474
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/86396
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 42 Number 1/2 (2006)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse