Browse

Genericity in Middle Constructions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYearn Jae-Il-
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-06T00:44:54Z-
dc.date.available2014-02-06T00:44:54Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.38 No.4, pp. 1151-1184ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/90758-
dc.description.abstractIn middle constructions the external argument is syntactically inactive, but is understood to be people in general. But controversially it is optionally realized as a for-phrase which can denote a specific individual. I propose that a for-phrase is indirectly associated with the implied agent. However, this does not explain the observation that middle constructions tend to be generic. A middle verb itself is aspectually non-generic, but a middle construction is generic as a whole. This requires the presence of the generic operator. One thing missing is how a middle construction is guaranteed to be generic. I propose that the event argument is given the feature [ANY], which must be associated with the generic operator. My proposal could cause some problems in semantic interpretation, and I show that they can be avoided by existential disclosure.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.subjectmiddleko_KR
dc.subjectgenericko_KR
dc.subjectexistential disclosureko_KR
dc.subjectimplicit argumentko_KR
dc.titleGenericity in Middle Constructionsko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 38 Number 1/4 (2002)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse