Publications
Detailed Information
Gapless Adnominal Clauses in Korean and their Interpretations
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yeom, Jae-Il | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-13T08:52:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-13T08:52:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 어학연구, Vol.51 No.3, pp. 597-627 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0254-4474 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/95137 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In Korean there are various gapless adnominal clauses. One common morpheme they share is the adnominalizer -(u)n. Assuming that only a relative clause has a gap that is coindexed with the adnominalizer, the meaning of a gapless adnominal clause is determined locally. A NP with an adnominal clause can denote an abstract thing like a situation, a fact or a proposition, except for so-called gapless relative clauses, which denote concrete things. A situation-denoting clause and a gapless relative clause allows no mood marker. A mood marker is required by a proposition-denoting clause, but optionally allowed in a fact-denoting clause. To explain the four meanings, I claim that a clause without a mood marker denotes a property of situations, separate from an event introduced by a verb. A mood marker converts a property of situations to a proposition. A fact is an extensional realization of the corresponding proposition. | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 언어교육원 | ko_KR |
dc.subject | gapless adnominal clause | ko_KR |
dc.subject | situation | ko_KR |
dc.subject | fact | ko_KR |
dc.subject | proposition | ko_KR |
dc.subject | gapless relative clause | ko_KR |
dc.title | Gapless Adnominal Clauses in Korean and their Interpretations | ko_KR |
dc.type | SNU Journal | ko_KR |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 어학연구(Language Research) | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.