Publications

Detailed Information

Gapless Adnominal Clauses in Korean and their Interpretations

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYeom, Jae-Il-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-13T08:52:49Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-13T08:52:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.51 No.3, pp. 597-627ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/95137-
dc.description.abstractIn Korean there are various gapless adnominal clauses. One common morpheme they share is the adnominalizer -(u)n. Assuming that only a relative clause has a gap that is coindexed with the adnominalizer, the meaning of a gapless adnominal clause is determined locally. A NP with an adnominal clause can denote an abstract thing like a situation, a fact or a proposition, except for so-called gapless relative clauses, which denote concrete things. A situation-denoting clause and a gapless relative clause allows no mood marker. A mood marker is required by a proposition-denoting clause, but optionally allowed in a fact-denoting clause. To explain the four meanings, I claim that a clause without a mood marker denotes a property of situations, separate from an event introduced by a verb. A mood marker converts a property of situations to a proposition. A fact is an extensional realization of the corresponding proposition.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.subjectgapless adnominal clauseko_KR
dc.subjectsituationko_KR
dc.subjectfactko_KR
dc.subjectpropositionko_KR
dc.subjectgapless relative clauseko_KR
dc.titleGapless Adnominal Clauses in Korean and their Interpretationsko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구(Language Research)-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share