Browse

국어 심리형용사문의 몇 가지 문제
Some Problems on Psych-adjective Sentences of Korean

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
김세중
Issue Date
1989
Publisher
서울대학교 언어교육원
Citation
어학연구, Vol.25 No.1, pp. 151-165
Abstract
Psych-adjective sentences have been discussed due to the special character in their syntax and semantics. In Korean, they have two noun phrases. The issue is which of the two NPs is the subject of a sentence and what is the grammatical function of the other NP. We argue that both NPs are all arguments of psych-adjectives, and the first NP (in unmarked word order) is a subject and the second NP is a complement. That is, psych adjectives are special kind of predicate in that they require two arguments, experiencer and object. Thus, the second NP arguments of psych-adjectives, anita(not to be), toeta (become) are grouped as a natural class since they form an AP together with those predicates. However, the reason why the nominative case marker -ka is attached to the complement NP argument needs to be solved. And, the dative marker -eke can be attached to the first NP argument of some psych-adjectives should be explained. The commonness and difference of psych-adjectives are also discussed.
ISSN
0254-4474
Language
Korean
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/85831
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 25 Number 1/4 (1989)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse